Wednesday, April 23, 2014
You are here: Home » MMA » Culinary Union calls on NSAC to adopt “Bill of Rights” for pro MMA fighters

Culinary Union calls on NSAC to adopt “Bill of Rights” for pro MMA fighters

LAS VEGAS — The Culinary Union, who has been the primary antagonist to getting MMA legalized in New York has taken yet another shot at Zuffa and the UFC.

Today, a representative for Culinary Workers Union, Local 226 went before the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) in Las Vegas and gave testimony outlining what they call exploitative business practices within the sport. They called on the commission to adopt a ”Bill of Rights for Professional Mixed-Martial Artists” comparable to the protection pro boxers currently receive under the Professional Boxers Bill of Rights and the Muhammad Ali Boxing Reform Act.

Chris Serres, a research analyst with the Culinary Workers Union, Local 226, said:

“Many athletes who compete in the sport of mixed-martial arts are subject to coercive contracts and exploitative business practices that are not allowed in professional boxing. We call on the Nevada Athletic Commission to take a leadership role and push for the adoption of this ‘Bill of Rights’ in every state where it is currently legal to hold mixed-martial arts events. If adopted and enforced, these ten rights would change the sport’s most egregious business practices.”

During his testimony before the NSAC today, Serres said they spoke with more than 50 professional MMA fighters and their agents and many of them feel exploited and undervalued, and in general, struggle against the following abuses:

a) Long-term, exclusivity contracts that bind an athlete to a single promoter, in some cases indefinitely.  Some contracts contain “automatic renewal” provisions or a “champion’s clause,” which automatically extends the contract of a fighter who becomes a champion.4 Such clauses make it more difficult for athletes to negotiate higher pay and diminish the incentive of smaller promoters to bid for talented fighters.

b) Limited control over image and likeness rights. Some contracts with promoters require an athlete to relinquish rights to his own image and likeness in perpetuity, or forever. The fighter must agree to forfeit future revenue streams from DVD sales, video games, clothing and other merchandising, even after retirement.

c) Lack of financial transparency. Under the Ali Act, promoters are required to make extensive financial disclosures to state athletic commissions, including copies of all written agreements with boxers participating in a match. No such requirements govern MMA under federal law or Nevada law. As a result, MMA fighters often have to negotiate in the dark and are unsure if they are being compensated fairly.

A complete copy of Serres’ testimony before the NSAC as well as the Culinary Union’s proposed “Bill of Rights for Professional Mixed-Martial Artists” is available here.

  • Warren Day

    I didn’t know Culinary was something related to Fighting …

    learn something new everyday

  • Anonymous

    The owners of the UFC, Fertittas, own Station Casinos. They don’t have a union and that pisses the Culinary guys off, hence they have been waging war on Zuffa and the UFC.

  • Warren Day

    I know that but if I belonged to that union, I would still ask the question as well as “How is this my concern?”

  • Anonymous

    Oh of course. It’s not. It’s ridiculous. And the fact that they didn’t even mention the name “UFC” in their address to the NSAC today is laughable… as if no one knows their real agenda. They don’t give a rat’s a** about MMA, of course they don’t. It’s all politics and all goes back to money. The Union wants all the money they would get from Station Casinos workers and because they won’t play ball, they’re trying these dirty tactics. It makes them look very foolish in my opinion and no one is falling for it.

  • Warren Day

    exactly, if fighters want a union then they should have one but who are these twits to be speaking up for them

  • Pingback: Culinary Union calls on NSAC to adopt “Bill of Rights” for pro MMA fighters – Pro MMA Now - MMA Fighting Results

  • edub

    I think a UFC only fighters union (UFCA – Ultimate fighting combatant’s association is term I coined a while back, ahem) would be great for the sport. It would keep all the top tier guys with the same promoter (so we wouldn’t get a situation like boxing happening with promoters and fighters ducking and not working with each other) but it would have the financial transparency needed for better negotiating.

    It’s just up to the fighters to do it.

    This garbage will not effect that in any way shape or form.

  • Canadianboy2424

    Wow this is no big surprise you lazy union fucks see a opportunity to make money off of hard working people while you lazy pieces of shit sit back and jerk each other off. Fuck unions there only there to make people lazy and to make the extremely lazy people rich

  • Pingback: MMA » Video: UFC’s Dana White Responds To Call For An MMA Bill Of Rights – Bloody Elbow

  • Pingback: Sports Facts » Video: UFC’s Dana White Responds To Call For An MMA Bill Of Rights – Bloody Elbow

  • Pingback: MMA » MMA: Plenty of power this time around for American Mixed Martial Arts Fight … – Bucks Local News

Scroll To Top